Hi-Lo is slightly superior in single deck, while Red Seven and KO are about the same.
The Hi-Lo counting system is one where there are equal points that add up to 0 when the last card is dealt.
The answer is simply that John Auston did not set up his jugar juegos tragamonedas 7 gratis wgbjs sims so that all systems had to conform to the average bet specs of the optimal KO betting strategy.
If we were to force average bets.63 units on Hi-Lo and KO, they would perform even worse in comparison with Red Seven.Knock-Out Blackjack by Olaf Vancura and Ken Fuchs.There are many card counting systems that are used when playing blackjack and each system has a different level of difficulty and accuracy.The system comparison charts in Chapter Five of the 1996 edition and again in the Appendix of the 1998 edition would lead one to believe that the KO Count was superior to or equal to just about every other counting system on the planet, and.John Auston used the approach that has recently become commonly known as score to compare the Red Seven (Red 7 Hi-Lo, and KO count systems.The single-deck penetration was 65 and all other games were.Red Seven is now the weakest performer, as KO is capitalizing on its strength when many more opportunities arise for playing and betting with a 2 advantage.KO Card Counting Strategy, kO or Knock Out strategy begins with the fact mejor ruleta online hd that when the whole deck is used up, the count should not end up being zero.This is one of the most basic systems used by blackjack players today and it is a perfect system for new card counters.
Well look at the risk-adjusted results with six decks (75.5 decks (82 and 7 decks (88).
For example, look at this six deck game with a less favorable set of rules: Risk-Adjusted, Six Deck, H17, DAS, 75 Dealt Spread Hi-Lo KO Red Seven 1-220.127.116.11 1-10.20.95.90.54.10 Risk-Adjusted, Six Deck, H17, DAS,.5 Dealt Spread.
If I simply raise the true juegos gratis ruleta casino espanol count by one or two numbers where these bigger bets are placed, then Hi-Lo will appear to be a stronger system.
Austons Data on KO, Red Seven, Hi-Lo, and Omega II 1-deck 2-deck 6-deck 8-deck.18.104.22.168 Red22.214.171.124.39 Hi-Lo.126.96.36.199 Omega.188.8.131.52 Since the Worlds Greatest Blackjack Simulation reports were published in 1997.
Hi-Lo, KO and Red Seven go back and forth in their exhibitions of strength relative to each other.
However, you can find a far more detailed description of what Vancura and Fuchs recommend by picking up a copy of their book.
These point values are used to establish a running count which then becomes the basis for raising or lowering ones bets at the blackjack table.One of the worst examples of misleading simulation data from ill-chosen betting schemes can be found.And beating Hi-Lo in all games?In shoe games, for example, I provide index numbers for the Advanced Red Seven that are to be used only in the second half of the shoe.I was unable to find the reference in print but the technique has been used by some Red Seven and Halves players for many years.As mentioned, this is a simple system.I can assure you, however, that it is playing with more risk than Hi-Lo, so in reality it would require a larger bankroll to play Red Seven to its optimum performance in these games.Those who use it swear it is the easiest and most accurate way to count with these systems.For those of you who do not have John Austons Worlds Greatest Blackjack SimulationRed Seven Edition, I am reproducing below all of the running count indices that John used in that report as well as in his risk-adjusted analyses.The sims will simply not show accurate data for the Advanced Red Sevens true power.In the real world, it is more meaningful to optimize the percent advantage than the maximum potential dollar win.This month I recommend you visit.A Hi-Lo player who is using more indices for the common playing variations that occur both at negative counts and at higher positive counts would actually expect a performance level closer to the Advanced Omega II system (which Auston simmed with a full set.